| |
This pair of projects was produced
with Sara Manazza for a show at the Telecom Italia Future
Center in Venice for the E1
exhibition unit at Interaction Ivrea. The exhibition was
aimed at children and making interactive workshops for them
to engage with. For various reasons it was not exhibited at
the show.You can read about
the show here
|
| Tavofono
The user
of this installation can record audio into the buttons that
make up the table surface, they then write on the button what
they have recorded. They can then make a telephone call, but
they cannot speak directly to the person they are calling,
rather they must utilise the audio they (or others) have recorded
into the different buttons on the table. Over time the table
becomes an encyclopedia of telephone conversations. |
The
photographs were all taken by Walter Aprile and the video was
produced by Simone Muscolino with Crispin Jones and Stefano
Mirti.
|
Concepts
There were a number of ideas that underpin this installation
- firstly we were interested in the essentially repetitive nature
of most telephone calls. Whilst some psychologists and linguistic
analysists argue that all conversation is improvisation others,
notably Ervine Goffman in his book "The presentation of
the self in everyday life", argue that conversation is
highly constrained by the cultural 'scripts' that we learn.
We were interested in the notion of an underlying structure
- how often do we take conversations (especially telephone conversations)
down the same lines? This idea is well illustrated in the cartoon
opposite.
We were inspired by Andy Warhol's pre-recording of his answers
to an interview on a cassette recorder in "Andy Warhol
Television". We understood this gesture as both Warhol's
way of highlighting the formulaic nature of the interview and
also as his solution to his own personal phonophobia (well documented
in his diaries) - his fear of speaking aloud.
Another central idea is that of identity theft, a crime which
has been much facilitated by our widespread adoption of digital
technology. Whereas in the past our transactions (financial
and personal) were verified with the signature - a mark left
by the specific movement of our bodies, today the digital transaction
carries little, if any, trace of our presence. We were curious
as to what this sensation of identity theft would be like in
a telephone call - one of the few remaining communication space
where our own physical presence is essential. This is not to
say that the telephone is infallible - the familiar trick of
imitating someone else's voice means there is always room for
subversion.
The installation was originally constructed for an exhibition
for children at the Telecom Italia Future Center in Venice.
We were excited to be able to facilitate the way children use
the telephone for prank or hoax phone calls within the object.
Indeed as a tool for prank phone calls the installation is very
successful - there is no danger of laughing during the call
and giving yourself away to the victim, also the prankster can
adopt the voice of anyone who has recorded words on the installation. |
|